![]() ![]() The primary benefit of using the Bayer filter data as a file input is the number of color channels, and most cameras use it when saving RAW files. The RAW model also does the demosaicing itself, which should be much better than traditional demosaicing algorithms because we use the original Bayer filter data that the camera sensor records as the input source. Using Bayer filter data for improved results The RAW model can now learn the unchanged noise patterns and apply better noise reduction without the inherent flaws of processed RGB files. We can eliminate this extra effort with our new RAW model by utilizing the pure RAW data from the camera, where noise is ideal. Also, the RGB images can go through additional editing processes by the users, which we also account for in our RGB model training.As a result, a great deal of effort is required to cover all possible variances when using RGB models to apply noise reduction. When we train a model for RGB images, we take the variations of these RAW converters into account. Different RAW converters use varying conversion methods that change the noise pattern of the sensor data. Unfortunately, RAW converters introduce clipping, demosaicing, and other post-processing steps when converting the RAW data to an RGB image. Currently, the supported workflow requires you to convert your RAW file to a processed RGB file format that DeNoise AI uses as the input source. Let's say you want to use DeNoise AI to apply noise reduction to a RAW photo you have stored in your Adobe Lightroom Classic catalog. ![]() I know I could get better noise reduction if I processed the RAW files first but for the turnaround time required this works best for me.The best way to explain the benefits of the new RAW model is to compare how it works with our four existing DeNoise AI models: Standard, Clear, Low Light, and Severe Noise. I edit them in LrC then export to jpeg files and then setup Topaz DeNoise to batch process all of the exported images. I do this when editing a large number of sports images. You would have to decide for your workflow the best sequence for you. You process the files in a Topaz product and then import them into Lightroom or you can export your files from Lightroom and then process them in Topaz. Keeping the above in mind you can use a Topaz product as a stand alone application. The plugin just handles the transfer of the file out of LrC to the Topaz application and then back into LrC. The image is then edited in Topaz and when finished a copy is sent back to LrC. When you choose to edit a file in a Topaz product the plugin will create another copy of the image in LrC and launch the Topaz application. The Topaz or DXO products are stand alone products that have a plugin for applications like LrC and Photoshop. I have it setup so I can click on sync icon next to the collection and it will sync that collection to my Lr cloud version. ![]() I do this at times for collections in my LrC catalog that I may want to share when traveling. I haven't done this enough to give you good directions setup instruction but you might do an internet search and find a video tutorial on how this is setup. You could then edit the files using Topaz products on a PC and the edited version would then sync back to the cloud. Lightroom Classic is designed to sync collections you choose to the cloud version of Lightroom. What version of Lightroom are you using? Are you part of the Adobe Photography plan? If so, you can use both products if you want. Internet upload speeds can create very long wait time if you want to upload a large number of files and you have a limited amount of cloud storage space. The disadvantage for many of us is that the images have to be in the cloud to be edited. The advantage of the cloud version is that you can access and edit your files from any device you choose.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |